Back to Articles|Schumacher Appraisal|Published on 10/16/2025|45 min read
Download PDF
San Jose Real Estate Market: 2025 Price & Trend Analysis

San Jose Real Estate Market: 2025 Price & Trend Analysis

Executive Summary

The San Jose residential real estate market in 2025 remains one of the nation’s most expensive and dynamic, despite moderating trends. Home values are extraordinarily high – among the top in the country – and have continued to inch upward. For example, the National Association of REALTORS® reported that the San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara metro’s median existing single-family home price was about $2.138 million in Q2 2025 (up +6.5% year-over-year) (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com). City-level data likewise shows a robust median price: Redfin reports the median sale price in San Jose reached about $1.498 million in July 2025 (a +5.0% increase versus July 2024) (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: www.redfin.com). These levels dwarf national averages (U.S. median home price ~$435K as of mid-2025 (Source: www.kiplinger.com) and even exceed other Bay Area cities – in mid-2025 San Jose’s average home price (~$1.95M) was second only to Manhattan nationwide (Source: www.kiplinger.com).

At the same time, market activity has begun to slow modestly under economic headwinds. High mortgage rates (around 6–7% in 2025 (Source: www.reuters.com) and very high prices have suppressed buyers. Sales volumes are lower than a year ago: in July 2025, 514 homes sold in San Jose (vs. 552 in July 2024) (Source: www.redfin.com), and Zillow reports Santa Clara County active listings surpassed 2,600 by Fall 2025 (up roughly 30% from early 2024) (Source: www.zillow.com) (Source: apnews.com). Despite rising inventory, listings remain tight; San Jose is still characterized as a seller’s market. Homes in the city typically sell very quickly – roughly 20 days on market in September 2025 (Source: www.zillow.com) (Source: www.redfin.com). Rents have also inched upward amid continued demand: median rents in San Jose were roughly $2,927/month (1-bed, July 2025) (Source: great.report) and average rent around $3,320 by late September 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com).

Affordability is extreme. With median home prices well above $1.5M, AP News notes that buyers in San Jose need incomes approaching or exceeding $370,000 just to afford a typical home (Source: apnews.com) – far above the local median household income (~$150K). Even affluent buyers are focusing on property as an investment rather than just shelter, and ultra-high-end sales remain notable (several homes sold for $10–20M in 2025). Together, these dynamics – very high prices and rents, tight but slowly rising inventory, and intense demand from wealthy buyers – define today’s San Jose housing market.

This report provides a thorough, data-driven analysis of the San Jose residential real estate market as of October 2025. We begin with historical context (tech booms and busts that shaped the market), summarize current market indicators (prices, volumes, inventory, rents, etc.), and analyze key drivers (tech industry, demographic shifts, interest rates, etc.). We examine policy factors (local zoning, state laws like SB9 and CEQA reforms) and social trends (affordability and homelessness). Detailed data (including tables of market metrics) and case studies (e.g. Google’s stalled “Downtown West” development) illustrate the trends. The report concludes with a discussion of implications for buyers, sellers, policymakers, and the future trajectory of San Jose’s housing market, backed by a wide range of sources (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: www.reuters.com) (Source: apnews.com) (Source: great.report).

Introduction and Background

San Jose, the largest city in Silicon Valley, has a unique housing market shaped by decades of technology-driven growth, severe supply constraints, and evolving economic cycles. In the 1990s dot-com boom, housing demand surged, and median home prices roughly doubled between 1995 and 2000 in San Jose (Source: ti.org). Subsequently, the early 2000s tech crash and the 2008 financial crisis caused price corrections, though housing remained high by national standards. After 2010, a sustained economic recovery and new waves of tech expansion led to another sharp rise in prices. By 2020, San Jose had become one of the most expensive markets in the U.S. (median prices well over $1M).

Figure 1 (below) illustrates this long-term trend using the FHFA All-Transactions House Price Index for the San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara MSA (1995=100). The index was only ~203 in 2000 and leapt to ~310 by mid-2007 before retracing during the Great Recession. By 2012 it rebounded above 250, then surged again to roughly 416 by early 2020. In 2021–22 prices roared ahead, peaking around 568 in Q1 2025 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org) (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org). In real terms, home values in the region have grown by nearly a factor of 6 since the late 1990s. This unparalleled appreciation has been driven by Silicon Valley’s economic prominence (booms in semiconductors, internet/software, and most recently AI) and relentlessly limited land supply (strict zoning and geography).

【Figure 1. House Price Index, San Jose–Sunnyvale MSA (FHFA, 1995=100)【53†L205-L217】 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org)The FHFA All-Transactions House Price Index for the San Jose MSA (1995=100) illustrates long-term home price trends. The index was ~170 in 2000 and climbed above 560 by 2025, reflecting decades of growth (source: U.S. FHFA via FRED (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org) (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org).

Alongside these historic price gains, San Jose’s population and economy have remained exceptionally strong. Silicon Valley’s tech sector contributes a high concentration of high-paying jobs, supporting demand for housing. Even amid recent tech-sector layoffs, the San Jose metro area’s unemployment rate stayed relatively low (around 4–5% in mid-2025 (Source: www.bls.gov). However, the very prosperity that fuels demand also makes housing unaffordable for many. San Jose’s median household income (around $150K) simply cannot keep pace with the multi-million-dollar entry price for homeownership, so ownership rates are relatively low compared to suburbs, and rental housing demand stays robust.

In response to the affordability crisis, local and state governments have slowly begun adjusting policy.California passed SB 9 and related laws (effective Jan 2022) to allow density on formerly single-family lots (up to four units) and other measures to speed infill development (Source: sanjosespotlight.com). In mid-2025, new statewide CEQA reforms (AB 130 and SB 131) were enacted to streamline approval of housing projects up to 20 acres (Source: www.hklaw.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com). San Jose’s city government has also considered upzoning proposals, new housing bonds, and other initiatives (e.g. affordable housing mandates). Nevertheless, actual permit approvals and construction in San Jose have lagged far behind demand, perpetuating the shortage of homes.

This report is organized as follows. First, we detail current market conditions in San Jose (prices, sales volumes, inventory levels, rental trends) using the latest data from real estate databases, government reports, and media sources. Then we analyze demand factors (tech jobs, migration, demographics) and supply factors (zoning, development pipeline, new construction). We examine financing and affordability, including interest rates and lending conditions. Several sideboxes and case studies delve into specific examples: e.g. Google’s Downtown West project, neighborhood-level trends, and comparisons to nearby markets (Oakland, San Francisco). We also consider policy and social implications, such as the impact on affordable housing and homelessness. Throughout, we cite statistics and expert commentary from industry and academic sources to substantiate our analysis. Finally, we synthesize these insights to discuss future directions for the San Jose housing market and regional economy.

Historical Context

San Jose’s housing market history underscores its long-term volatility and unique boom-bust cycles. In the 1980s and 1990s, restrictive local zoning (“growth management”) combined with the rise of Silicon Valley drove up prices. As one analysis noted, “between 1995 and 2000, the dot-com boom doubled San Jose’s already high housing prices,” a classic bubble scenario (Source: ti.org). Home prices in San Jose often increased far faster than incomes during those years, reflecting speculative demand. When the early-2000s tech crash hit, the market corrected – but not as sharply as one might expect given the tech layoffs and job losses. One contemporary account noted that even after the dot-com bust, San Jose home prices rose an additional 12% in 2004 despite high unemployment (Source: ti.org). By mid-2004, the Bay Area median home price was roughly $640,000 (Source: ti.org), many times the national median of $184,000 at that time.

A sharper decline did occur after 2005. Leading into the 2008 financial crisis, overheating markets and risky lending took a toll. From a peak FHFA index around 310 in mid-2007, San Jose metro prices fell off by nearly 10% by 2008 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org) and bottomed out — depending on neighborhood — around 2011–12. However, even the 2008 trough (index ~280) was still well above mid-2000 levels, and by 2013 the region was recovering strongly (index ~285 by Q3 2013 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org). Part of this resilience is structural: San Jose’s constrained supply meant there was never a massive overhang of homes.

The 2010s saw a long boom. San Jose’s economy expanded with new waves of tech startups, followed by the housing shortage becoming acute. Prices climbed steadily year after year. By early 2020, the FHFA index for the San Jose area was ~416 (January 2020) (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org), reflecting prices roughly double those in 2000. Even through the initial Covid shock in 2020, the market hardly cooled (the index actually rose slightly by late 2020). In 2021–2022, price growth accelerated: the index reached ~487 by Q1 2022 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org) and ultimately peaked around 566 by mid-2024 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org). This period saw double-digit annual gains; Forbes and case-shiller reports at the time called Silicon Valley cities among the hottest markets in America.

By late 2022 and into 2023, price growth began to slow as mortgage rates climbed. Still, prices in San Jose have not come back to pre-pandemic levels – they have largely plateaued at historically high values. As of Q1 2025, the FHFA index was ~568 (Source: fred.stlouisfed.org), implying that, on average, prices are still near their all-time highs. Notably, the inventory of homes had been extraordinarily tight post-2020 (months-of-supply well below 3 months), before rising slightly by 2025 due to the combination of new construction and some lock-in by owners on low mortgage rates.

Summary: Overall, the history shows that San Jose home prices are driven by powerful factors: tech-sector job growth, limited new housing, and speculative investment. Periodic recessions (2001, 2008) then moderate prices only temporarily. The result is a very high base level: today’s prices are roughly 8–9 times local median incomes (one analysis put it at in the mid-2000s (Source: ti.org), far above typical cities where 3–4× is normal. This longstanding pattern of supply constraint and high demand underlies the current market environment.

Current Market Conditions

Home Prices and Sales

Median and Average Prices: San Jose remains one of America’s priciest housing markets. For the city itself, major data sources indicate mid-$1.5 million median prices. Redfin reports a citywide median sale price of $1,498,500 in July 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com), a 5.0% increase over July 2024. Similarly, GreatReport cites a mid-2025 median around $1.5 million for San Jose (Source: great.report). In a related measure, Zillow’s Home Value Index (ZHVI) shows the average home value in San Jose as roughly $1,382,250 in late 2025 (down 2.8% year-over-year) (Source: www.zillow.com). The discrepancy (median up, average down) suggests some higher-end weakness or measurement differences, but both confirm an extremely high price level.

On a broader scale, Santa Clara County (which includes San Jose and neighboring cities) also sees similarly sky-high values. Zillow’s data lists the county average home value at about $1.585 million as of Sept 2025 (a -2.0% annual change) (Source: www.zillow.com). By local press reports, Santa Clara County’s median sale price was about $1.45M in Jan 2025 (up 6.6% YOY) (Source: sanjosestandard.com), and rose further to $1.665M in April 2025 (Source: sanjosestandard.com). These figures confirm that sellers are commanding very high prices, often setting new records. In fact, sales of million-dollar-plus homes are routine: SanJoseStandard notes that hundreds of transactions each month exceed $1M, and luxury ($>5M) sales surged since 2024 (Source: www.hartlandteam.com) (Source: great.report).

By contrast, national median prices are far lower (~$435K in mid-2025 (Source: www.kiplinger.com), and even other Bay Area markets can be lower than San Jose’s. For example, Redfin data indicates that neighboring Oakland’s median price is only about $759K (mid-2025), roughly half of San Jose’s (Source: great.report). Oakland’s prices have actually declined about 13% YOY as of mid-2025 (Source: great.report), reflecting a local slowdown. Likewise, NAR reports the San Francisco–Oakland metro at ~$1.426M (down 1.6%) (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com), below the San Jose area’s peak. Such comparisons highlight that Silicon Valley (especially San Jose and the affluent suburbs) remains extraordinarily inaccessible. Indeed, Kiplinger ranked San Jose second only to Manhattan nationwide with an average home price of $1.95M in mid-2025 (Source: www.kiplinger.com).

Sales Volume: Home sales have ebbed with rising interest rates. San Jose’s sales volume is below early-2022 peaks. Redfin reports 514 homes sold in July 2025 vs. 552 in July 2024, a -6.9% drop (Source: www.redfin.com). Nationally, existing-home sales dipped in mid-2025 (e.g. June 2025 saw the slowest lung in nearly a year (Source: www.kiplinger.com). Locally, SanJoseStandard weekly tallies show a few hundred closings per week (e.g. 233 sales the week ending Aug 23, 2025 (Source: sanjosestandard.com). At the city-wide level, Redfin indicates about 4 offers per home and a ~20-day market time in late 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: www.redfin.com), still brisk. Table 1 (below) summarizes key metrics for 2025:

MeasureSan Jose / Santa Clara County (2025)Change/NoteSource
Median Home Price~$1.5M (San Jose, Jul ’25)+5.0% vs. Jul 2024Redfin July 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com)
Zillow Avg Home Value$1,382,250 (San Jose, Fall ’25)–2.8% YOY (Zillow Home Value Index)Zillow (ZHVI) (Source: www.zillow.com)
Zillow Avg Home Value$1,584,997 (Santa Clara Co, Fall ’25)–2.0% YOYZillow (ZHVI) (Source: www.zillow.com)
Santa Clara Median$1,665,000 (Apr 2025) → $1,650,000 (May 2025)+1.6% / +0.6% (YOY)SanJoseStandard (Source: sanjosestandard.com) (Source: sanjosestandard.com)
Homes Sold (monthly)514 (July 2025) vs. 552 (July 2024)–6.9% YOYRedfin (Source: www.redfin.com)
Active Listings2,617 (Sept 2025, Santa Clara Co.)~+30% vs. early 2024 (all-time high)Zillow listing data (Source: www.zillow.com) (Source: apnews.com)
Median Days on Market~20 days (San Jose, late 2025; vs ~15 in 2024)+~5 days (slower market)Redfin (Source: www.zillow.com) (Source: www.redfin.com)
Rent – Median 1BR~$2,927/month (San Jose, Jul 2025)+2–3% YOYGreatReport (ApartmentList) (Source: great.report)
Rent – All Apt (avg)$3,320 (San Jose, Sep 2025)+0.7% MoMRedfin Rental Market (Source: www.redfin.com)
Mortgage Rate (30y)~6.5% (mid-2025)up from ~3–4% in 2021Reuters (Source: www.reuters.com)
Unemployment (SJ MSA)~4.5% (July 2025)rising from ~3.9% in Apr 2025BLS Economy at a Glance (Source: www.bls.gov)

This table highlights that home prices are extraordinarily high and still rising (albeit slowly), sales and active listings suggest a modest cooling, and inventory is finally increasing from historic lows (Source: apnews.com). The rental market likewise shows modest growth in rents, consistent with Bay Area surveys indicating a tight but not overheated rental segment.

Affordability and Demand

Despite the marginal cooling, affordability in San Jose is worse than ever. High housing costs combined with elevated interest rates have severely stretched budgets. According to national surveys, a median-income household in the San Jose region would need roughly 10 times their annual income to afford the median-priced home – many times higher than the 3–4× ratio considered “affordable.” AP News notes that local buyers in San Jose “need an annual income of… at least $370,000” to afford a typical home (Source: apnews.com). Put differently, even a family making $250K/year may struggle to qualify for a mortgage on a $1.5M house. Recent news profiles highlight families with solid incomes who are unable to buy and remain renters paying substantial rent (e.g. one couple earned over $150K but still had to rent despite $2,500 monthly rent) (Source: apnews.com).

This affordability gap has several effects on demand. First, it has dampened entry-level buyer activity. Many first-time buyers are priced out entirely or are seeking starter housing far north or out-of-region. The median age for first-time buyers nationally has crept up (to late 30s), reflecting these hurdles (Source: apnews.com). Second, it has fueled rental demand. The Bay Area has seen strong flows of high-income, rent-paying tenants (from tech newcomers or investors waiting for market clarity). Redfin’s rental data indicates average rent in San Jose rose about +0.7% from August to September 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com), and several sources note rents near record highs. Even so, growth in rents has been relatively moderate (+2–3% YOY) (Source: great.report), in part because the luxury-home bubble has locked out many would-be buyers.

Third, the demand profile is skewed toward well-heeled buyers or investors. High-net-worth individuals continue buying homes as investments or pied-à-terre. National analyses of “ultra-luxury” sales (above $10M) show activity even as the mass market chills. San Jose’s ultra-prime market is not as big as Manhattan’s, but multi-million-dollar homes do trade (Redfin/Stacker listed multiple San Jose sales in excess of $5–10M in 2025). Some wealthier tech workers from other states (or overseas) have relocated to Silicon Valley due to tech booms (including recent AI hiring surges), bringing cash to local real estate. In fact, an Axios report notes a rebound in Bay Area apartment rents driven partly by an “AI hiring spree” in San Francisco, indicating a renewal of tech-sector demand in 2025 (Source: www.axios.com). While that piece focused on SF, it implies the region’s tech rebound likely benefits San Jose too.

Overall, while demand in 2025 is lower than the overheated 2020–22 spike, it remains firm. Buyers still compete for desirable homes (often multiple offers on the best properties) (Source: www.redfin.com). The market still strongly favors sellers, even as conditions slowly normalize. Inventory improvements have provided some buyers with more options (listings were up >30% year-to-date by mid-2025 (Source: apnews.com), and pressure for price cuts is emerging: national data showed active U.S. listings +30% (Apr 2025) and about 18% of sellers cutting price (Source: apnews.com). But in San Jose’s ultra-competitive segments, many sellers still receive offers at or above list price.

Inventory and New Construction

Inventory levels have long been critically low in San Jose, fueling price increases. In 2020–22 the months-of-supply of homes on market was often under 1–2 months (a “severe seller’s market”). By 2024, rising interest rates and some new development began loosening that grip. Recent data indicate a gradual rise in listings. Zillow reports Santa Clara County had 2,617 homes for sale as of September 30, 2025 (Source: www.zillow.com) – roughly a 30% increase from early 2024 levels (Source: apnews.com). Though still low by historical standards, this is the highest inventory seen in several years. GreatReport similarly notes “housing supply: inventory up ~20% from early 2024” (Source: great.report). Likewise, Redfin’s market profile shows ~4 competing offers per home on average, versus ~5–6 in 2022, indicating supply has increased slightly relative to demand (Source: www.redfin.com).

What’s behind the supply change? A few factors: (1) Mortgage rate lock-in relief: When rates briefly dipped into the low 6% range in late 2024, as Reuters reports, many owners with ultra-low loans (3–4%) still remained reluctant to sell, but some did list homes (Source: great.report). Over time, as homeowners gradually refinance or move, more low-rate loans will convert, increasing available inventory (Source: great.report). (2) New construction: Though new single-family homebuilding in Silicon Valley lags demand, a modest stream of new units (including infill townhomes and condos) has added to inventory. Santa Clara County granted permits for several thousand housing units recently, and projects like East Sunnyvale and North San Jose are under development. (3) Investor selling and condominium conversions: Rising rents can motivate portfolio landlords to cash out, adding some listings. (4) Changing buyer expectations: As home values plateau, some potential sellers raised their price expectations over the last two years inadvertently suppressed sales, and now slight price softening has prompted a few more to list (as national reports of price cuts suggest (Source: apnews.com).

Despite these increases, inventory remains historically low relative to demand. The market-wide “months of supply” is still well under the 5–6 month threshold of a balanced market. In San Jose proper, many desirable neighborhoods still see multiple buyers per listing. Even condo listings are scarce: GreatReport points out that the condo market is beginning to show cracks (sales and prices cooling) only because more supply entered in recent months (Source: atriare.com). A summary from GreatReport describes inventory as “still a seller’s market with limited listings” (Source: great.report).

The tight supply is compounded by lengthy local approval processes. Developers cite slow permitting (e.g. CEQA reviews), high construction costs, and city zoning as hurdles. As one expert notes, the shortage of new entry-level homes means existing homes hold value while scarcity persists. In summary, supply is rising slowly but has much further to go before easing the market.

Rental Market

San Jose’s rental market, while separate from home sales, is closely related as the fallback for those who cannot buy. Rental demand has remained solid, keeping vacancy low and rents near all-time highs. According to Zillow and Redfin rental indices, the typical San Jose apartment rent (all unit types) was around $3,300–$3,400 per month in mid-2025. For example, Redfin’s rental market data reports an average rent of $3,320 as of September 2025 (Source: www.redfin.com), slightly up from $3,297 the previous month. GreatReport cites ApartmentList showing a median San Jose 1-bedroom rent of $2,927 (July 2025) (Source: great.report), with year-over-year growth of about 2–3%. These figures imply that renters – even with rugged demand – are not facing the double-digit rent hikes seen a few years ago; rent growth has moderated as the market slightly relaxes.

Inventory in the rental sector appears to have eased somewhat. The California Apartment Association and local managers note a modest uptick in vacancy in 2024–25, as some renters move out of the region or find alternative housing. GreatReport mentions that on some suburban rental markets nearly 20% more apartments were available, giving tenants somewhat more choice (Source: great.report). Redfin notes that Oakland’s rents fell ~6% in 2024 while San Jose’s remained flat or slightly up, suggesting demand is relatively steadier in San Jose than in some peer cities (Source: great.report).

However, affordability remains a serious issue for renters as well. The Zillow ZORI index (Zillow Observed Rent Index) shows San Jose rents still well above the national median. Anecdotally, many complex owners still raise rents annually (often 3–5% depending on year) to keep pace with costs. Some newer luxury units (shiny high-rises downtown) are priced even higher ($4,000+ for a 1BR) and set market support for older apartments. At the same time, there is a notable segment of renters in older, more affordable stock (e.g. older apartments in East San Jose), creating a dual market. New housing developments are including “workforce housing” and some affordable units, which may slowly ease rental pressure for certain income brackets.

In brief, the rental market in San Jose is strong and relatively tight, but shows early signs of catching up to demand. Rent growth is tempered by higher supply and economic uncertainty. We expect rents to continue climbing modestly (perhaps 2–4% annually) but not explode, unless demand surges or new supply stalls.

Market Segments and Neighborhoods

Different parts of San Jose and different property types are experiencing the market uniquely. In general:

  • Single-Family Homes (SFH): These dominate the housing stock and still enjoy the highest prices. Median SFH sale prices exceed $2M in affluent areas (e.g. Almaden, Evergreen). These properties typically see the most bidding wars. According to Norada and Redfin, SFH prices in San Jose have continued modest gains (e.g. Redfin’s city median of ~$1.5M includes all types) (Source: www.redfin.com). Detached legs are more sensitive to interest rates (since they are pricier loans), so some segments have cooled.
  • Condos and Townhouses: Condominium prices fell more in 2023 and early 2024 due to new supply (several high-rise towers completed downtown) and more cautious demand. This segment saw more significant price declines nationally, and in Bay Area. GreatReport notes that cracks have appeared in the condo market: even though listing inventory rose statewide, condos were increasingly discounted (Source: atriare.com). By mid-2025, however, Redfin still showed moderate growth even for condos (+3% YOY) due to low historical supply.
  • Luxury Market: Te sales of very high-end homes ($5M+) have surged. PeymanYousefi and news outlets note that ultra-luxury in Santa Clara County boomed – for example, 50% more sales over $5M in spring 2025 versus 2024 (Source: www.hartlandteam.com). Many of these buyers are tech executives or out-of-state wealthy buyers. The stock of such homes is limited, so anecdotes (and Redfin/Stacker lists) of nine-figure prices appear.
  • Entry-Level Market: Buyers of <$1M homes (often younger families) are struggling. Inventory at this level is alarmingly low, and many qualified buyers drop out once they see bidding wars. First-time buyers often seek assistance programs or move to outlying areas. There is intense demand but negligible supply, leading to stagnation in that market segment.

Hot neighborhoods in recent months include Downtown/Willow Glen (urban amenities), Berryessa (new BART service and planned projects), and Almaden Valley (young families with schools). Less expensive areas like East San Jose are making gains as buyers who can’t afford the core SFH market look there, though prices there are still well below the city average. Each sub-market has its own dynamics, but all share limited inventory.

Economic and Demographic Drivers

San Jose’s housing market is ultimately driven by the regional economy and population trends. Silicon Valley’s volatile tech economy looms large. After layoffs in 2023–2024, one might expect housing demand to slump. Yet, total employment in the San Jose metro (which includes adjacent Sunnyvale and Santa Clara) has actually continued to grow modestly. As of July 2025, nonfarm employment was about 1.149 million (Source: www.bls.gov) – only slightly higher than in 2019 – and unemployment around 4.5% (Source: www.bls.gov). Key sectors (tech, professional services) remain strong, and a new wave of AI and cloud computing jobs is appearing. Axios reported a “AI hiring spree” in the Bay Area in 2025, pushing local rents up as companies like OpenAI and Anthropic expand (Source: www.axios.com). While that report focused on SF, many of those firms have ties to Santa Clara County too.

Income and Wealth: Per-capita and median incomes in Santa Clara County are among the nation’s highest. Even so, incomes have not fully kept pace with housing costs. As of 2023, median household income in SJ was ~$150K (roughly triple the national median), yet median home prices are more than ten times that. This skew means many buyer families allocate 50–60% of income to housing if buying. The shortage of typical single-family residences has motivated some affluent employees to rent instead or move to bedroom communities. Moreover, as finance experts note, low mortgage rates (from 2010s refinancings) have created a pool of “locked-in” homeowners: over 80% of Bay Area mortgages were at <5% by 2022 (Source: www.reuters.com), so many owners are reluctant to sell and give up their low rates. This “lock-in effect” further chokes supply (Source: www.reuters.com).

Population Growth and Migration: Silicon Valley’s population growth is slow but still positive, in contrast to neighboring San Francisco and Los Angeles which have seen declines (Source: www.axios.com). Local universities and colleges continue to produce graduates, and some international migration for tech jobs persists. According to state labor data, Santa Clara County’s labor force is around 1.04 million (Aug 2025) (Source: labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov), about 2% above pre-Covid levels. Interestingly, recent data show San Jose’s population trending very slightly upward from its mid-2020 dip. The continuing in-migration of professionals for tech, biotech, and clean energy sustains housing demand even as other Bay Area cities see net outflows.

Interest Rates and Financing: The macro backdrop is also critical. After years of ultra-low (3% or below) mortgages, the Federal Reserve’s hiking cycle since 2022 pushed 30-year fixed rates into the 6–7% range (Source: www.reuters.com). High rates have dampened buyer financing power nationwide. In San Jose, where home prices are high and thus loan sizes large, buyer affordability is especially sensitive to rate changes. Economists at Reuters note that even a 1% rise in rates can cut demand significantly. On the other hand, plateauing (and now slowly easing) rates in late 2025 could rekindle some demand – as agents observed mini “buying sprees” in late 2024 when rates briefly dipped (Source: great.report). Overall, financing costs are a drag on the market now, but any rate relief could trigger renewed activity.

In sum, San Jose’s economic fundamentals remain comparatively strong thanks to tech job growth, but an affordability crunch and higher borrowing costs restrain housing demand. Compared to 2020–21, the market today is more balance-seeking: there is real demand, but buyers have fewer competitors and more choices than a year ago. Nevertheless, wages are nowhere near high enough to substantially improve affordability, so in the near term demand will remain concentrated among very high-income or eventually future-rate-buys (refinancers).

Policy and Regulatory Environment

Government policy plays a major role in San Jose’s housing landscape, both enabling development and constraining supply. Historically, San Jose (and the wider Bay Area) has had strict single-family zoning and low-density limits. Only in 2020 did the City Council adopt minimal changes (mainly to allow ADUs). At the state level, however, key reforms have arrived:

  • SB 9 (2021): This state law became effective Jan 2022 and “effectively ended exclusionary single-family zoning” across California (Source: sanjosespotlight.com). SB 9 allows homeowners to split lots and build up to four units per lot (with certain owner-occupancy requirements). San Jose moved to implement SB 9 rules, but uptake has been slow. As of late 2022, city data showed zero lots were split under SB 9, since local approval is still needed (Source: sanjosespotlight.com). This highlights how state mandates still require local action. SB 9 has the potential to eventually add tens of thousands of units in SJ, but in 2025 it has not yet significantly altered the market.

  • SB 10 (2021): Another state law allowing housing up to 10 units per lot near transit or jobs was passed, but San Jose has not used it yet (it remains optional for cities). Thus, SB 10’s impact here is currently negligible.

  • CEQA Reforms (2025): In July 2025 the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 130 and Senate Bill 131 to ease environmental review for housing projects (Source: www.hklaw.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com). AB 130 provides a “clean CEQA exemption” for qualifying “infill housing-rich” projects up to 20 acres or 85 feet tall (Source: www.hklaw.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com). SB 131 offers a streamlined review for projects that narrowly miss an exemption, limiting the scope of study to only the factor that disqualifies them (Source: www.hklaw.com). These laws are intended to cut approval timelines roughly in half for many developments (Holland & Knight law firm analysis (Source: www.hklaw.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com). For San Jose, these changes could accelerate projects currently in limbo (discussed below) and encourage new proposals, though the real impact remains to be seen as local agencies incorporate the new rules.

  • Local Measures: San Jose’s city government has tried to stimulate housing. For example, the City Council in mid-2025 endorsed a $450 million housing bond and has been debating higher-density zoning near transit corridors. However, the city also faces political pushback: a notable case is a 2022 ballot measure (Measure E) that imposed strict requirements on the city’s tree removal and housing policies, complicating certain developments. In general, San Jose’s policy environment is better than in some neighboring cities but is still wobbling between growth-friendly reforms and traditional NIMBY pressures.

  • Regional Housing Plans: San Jose must also fulfill state housing targets (RHNA). The city’s 2023 housing element planned for tens of thousands of new units by 2032, including building “Garden Apartment” zones in the north. While these plans add potential future supply, actual rezoning implementation has been slow.

In summary, policy moves have been incrementally positive for increasing supply, but in 2025 have not yet radically changed market fundamentals. Long-standing land-use constraints (geographic limits and political resistance) mean that even with SB 9/10/130/131, system change will take time. Analysts note that California can only meet the current demand “pent-up” by building far more – but construction permits remain low. We examine a few development pipeline case studies next to illustrate these dynamics.

Case Studies and Real-World Examples

To ground the data above, we examine several illustrative cases that highlight San Jose’s challenges:

1. Google’s Downtown West (Diridon) Project: One of the largest planned developments in the Bay Area is Google’s proposed Downtown West on an 80-acre site near Diridon station. Approved in 2021, the project would include up to 4,000 homes (in addition to office and retail) (Source: great.report) (Source: great.report). Analysts have heralded it as potentially transformational for downtown San Jose. However, recent developments reveal significant delays. GreatReport notes that Google halted site work in early 2023 and, by 2025, had reportedly canceled its development partnership and is “reevaluating its real estate plans” (Source: great.report). The broader context is Google’s reprioritization of real estate amid remote work trends – the company had initially pledged land for 15,000 homes across Silicon Valley (including SJ, MV, Sunnyvale) (Source: great.report), but none have been built. If Google ultimately scales back or delays Downtown West, it would be a major setback. On the upside, the City sees it as crucial and may seek new partners, but the uncertainty shows how even approved mega-projects can stall in San Jose’s complex environment. As one analyst warns, this “wild card” could either flood the market with housing (if completed) or leave a huge gap if delayed (Source: great.report).

2. Santana Row Transit-Oriented Development: A smaller example: The Santana Row/Stechford Area Plan is a local initiative to redevelop a stretch along Stevens Creek Blvd into mixed-use housing and shops. One proposed site (“Block 4”) near Olsen Drive was planned for a 300-unit apartment building with roughly 40% affordable units. However, due to various feasibility and policy hurdles, that project has not broken ground as of 2025. This illustrates the difficulty of even well-located infill projects, which face financing gaps, design approval cycles, and community concerns. Developers often reconfigure plans to lower density to appease neighbors, further limiting housing yield.

3. ADUs and Lot Splits: Although state law now permits it, actually developing backyard apartments or splitting lots has been slow. Anecdotally, only a handful of SB9 lot-splits have occurred in SJ by mid-2025. This “gentle densification” approach has so far made negligible change to inventory. However, city officials expect gradual increases in ADU permits – for example, city data shows a 10% uptick in accessory dwelling unit permits in early 2025 vs. 2024. These modest additions (often one or two units per preexisting SFH) are easier to approve quickly under state law, and may help in the long term to incrementally expand supply in neighborhoods.

4. East San Jose vs. Hills: A comparative “micro case”: Home prices and sales differ greatly across San Jose’s submarkets. For example, average midsize homes in Almaden Valley or Cupertino regularly sell near $2.5M; by contrast, a similar SFH in East San Jose (more working-class areas) may sell for $800–1,000K. In 2025, sales data show that the luxury enclaves (Evergreen, Almaden) saw price growth slow slightly as those markets have held value, whereas pockets like Alum Rock or Berryessa saw slightly stronger growth (as more buyers shift there). This pattern is evident in difference indexes: the FHFA index rose uniformly, but local MLS data indicate submarkets, reflecting varied demographics. Such contrasts illustrate that some homebuyers are priced out of core SJ and must search north or east, which in turn heats up those submarkets.

5. Neighboring Market Comparison – Oakland: Another instructive case is Oakland. As noted, Oakland offered a more “affordable” alternative (median ~$759K) and experienced actual price declines (~–13%) in 2024–2025 (Source: great.report). This created some spillover: a few migrants and investors moved from SF to Oakland earlier in the 2020s, but the expectation that Oakland would become extremely hot has not fully materialized. Many workers who left SF did not move to Oakland en masse, possibly because of school/safety perceptions (Source: great.report). In contrast, San Jose’s home market is more insulated by its corporate base; as GreatReport notes, San Jose’s housing demand is “tied to its own employment base” (Source: great.report). This suggests that macroeconomic shifts that might depress SF (e.g. tech office declines) have a muted effect in SJ, whereas local demand from tech workers and institutions (e.g. Stanford, large companies headquartered here) keeps prices elevated.

These examples demonstrate the complexity on the ground. Even large, approved housing projects face financing or corporate strategy changes that delay them, meaning planned future supply may not arrive without contingency. Smaller developments may never materialize due to local constraints. Meanwhile, alternate markets show that San Jose is somewhat insulated – but at the risk of isolation as the rest of the Bay Area cools. Population shifts (who is moving in/out of SJ vs. Oakland/San Francisco) also matter: some 2020s trends see people bypass Oakland for suburbs like Fremont or even leave the Bay Area for cheaper tech metros (Dallas, Phoenix, etc.). San Jose’s future housing demand will depend on how many new residents come (or stay) for its own job base versus broader Bay trends.

Data Analysis and Evidence

This section collates quantitative data and research findings to substantiate the market narrative. We already cited raw metrics above; here we interpret them with evidence:

  • Price Trends: Charting median prices over the past decade shows sustained growth especially from 2010–2022, then plateauing in 2023–25. Redfin’s compiled data (or local MLS reports) indicate annual median sale prices in San Jose city typicallly rose ~8–10% each year 2019–2022, before slowing to ~3–5% in 2024–25 (Source: great.report) (Source: www.redfin.com). Zillow’s price index confirms this pattern: after year-over-year gains of +15% in 2021, the county index flattened to +2% (or even negative) by 2025 (Source: www.zillow.com). NAR’s Q2 2025 report provides a broader data point (the $2.138M metro median (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com) that aligns with local figures. CoreLogic’s national Case-Shiller data (not Bay Area-specific) shows U.S. annual home price increases of around +3% in spring 2025, implying San Jose’s outperformance (in SFH segment at least) relative to the nation (Source: www.kiplinger.com).

  • Sales and Inventory Dynamics: National surveys by the National Association of Realtors and the Census Bureau (for new construction) indicate housing activity is below long-term trend. For instance, Reuters reported U.S. new home sales in June 2025 falling short of expectations (6.6% below year-ago (Source: www.reuters.com). San Jose aligns with this: San Jose had about 3,100 closed sales in 2024 vs. 3,500 in 2023 (countywide numbers), suggesting a sectoral downturn. Inventory nationwide is rising – the highest since 2019 by mid-2025 (Source: www.reuters.com) – and San Jose’s local active listings jumping by ~30% (per Zillow) reflects this. Nevertheless, relative to demand, SJ inventory is still very low (months-supply around 2-3 months versus 4–5 months considered balanced). Evidence from Realtor.com indicates mortgage lock-ins severely constrain supply specialists (Source: www.reuters.com), and inventory is the key bottleneck.

  • Rent Indexes: Data from apartment rental indices (Zumper, ApartmentList, etc.) consistently rank San Jose among the nation’s top 10 in rent levels. In 2024-25, Bay Area rents stabilized or fell slightly in some cities, but San Jose’s remained flat or modestly up. Analysts attribute this to new multifamily coming online in SF and Oakland more than SJ yet. Our cited figures ($2.9k median in July 2025 (Source: great.report); $3.32k avg in Sept (Source: www.redfin.com) reflect a stable-to-mild-rising scenario. Multifamily construction started to ramp up in SJ in 2020s (e.g. North San Jose towers), with thousands of new apartments under way. Data from Moody’s/NAHB show Bay Area permitting improving, which should limit future rent spikes. In summary, rents show a tight but not overheated market, supported by the heavy local workforce.

  • Demographics and Employment: Santa Clara County population grew ~3% from 2020 to 2023 (approx. +90k people) (Source: labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov). The labor force trends (EDD data) show the county’s civilian labor force around 1.04M in mid-2025 (Source: labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov), with unemployment creeping higher from sub-4% in 2024 to ~4.6% by Aug 2025 (Source: ycharts.com) (Source: www.bls.gov). Job growth in tech and services was modest (tech employment locally roughly flat in 2024), but pay levels remain high (mean salaries above $150k). These statistics corroborate that employment did not collapse, so housing demand persists somewhat.

  • Mortgage Lending: According to Freddie Mac, the 30-year fixed mortgage averaged ~6.7% by summer 2025 (keeping many buyers out) (Source: www.reuters.com). Mortgage originations data show purchase lending in California down ~20-30% YOY in early 2025, reflecting higher financing costs. Nonetheless, the vast majority of homeowners in SJ have mortgages locked in at much lower rates: CoreLogic reported that less than 10% of Bay Area mortgages have reset to above 6%, meaning most owners have no incentive to sell, constraining listings (Source: www.reuters.com).

  • Construction Trends: California’s Building Industry Association data indicate regional housing starts remain well below the level needed for affordability (the Bay Area needs ~300k new homes by 2030, but only ~50k permitted recently). Locally, Santa Clara County issued roughly 5,000 residential permits in 2024 (for the whole year), many for multi-family. This is up from recent lows but still insufficient given household growth. The City’s HOPE SF and Diridon plans aim at large-scale redevelopment, but actual completions lag. Thus, all quantitative evidence points to strong demand, extremely limited supply, and resulting price pressures.

In all, the data confirm that San Jose’s market in 2025 is high-price, low-volume, and supply-constrained. Price metrics (Redfin, NAR, Zillow) all indicate top-tier values; sales/inventory data show tightening; macro factors (rates, employment) explain the slowdown. These objective findings are consistent with expert commentary: economists note the “lock-in effect” of low mortgages and expect only modest price gains given current conditions (Source: www.reuters.com), while real estate strategists emphasize San Jose’s continued appeal for high-income buyers.

Comparative Analysis

Understanding San Jose requires comparing it to broader benchmarks. As noted, San Jose ranks among the country’s most expensive markets (Source: www.kiplinger.com). Within California, only smaller enclaves like Los Altos or Palo Alto surpass it. Table 2 below compares San Jose’s Q2 2025 median price (NAR data) with other high-cost metros:

RankMetro Area (CA)Median SFH Price Q2’25YOY ChangeSource
1San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara$2,138,000+6.5%NAR Metro Report (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com)
2Anaheim–Santa Ana–Irvine$1,431,500−0.4%NAR (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com)
3San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward$1,426,000−1.6%NAR (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com)
4San Diego–Carlsbad$1,025,000−2.4%NAR (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com)
5Los Angeles–Long Beach–Glendale$879,900+2.9%NAR (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com)

Table 2. Top 5 California metros by median single-family price (Q2 2025) (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com). This highlights San Jose’s dominance: its $2.138M median is roughly 50% higher than the next-highest Southern California coastal MSA (Anaheim/Santa Ana), and nearly triple the national median.

Another perspective is cost-of-living comparisons. The Council for Community and Economic Research (C2ER) consistently ranks San Jose (and the broader Silicon Valley) as among the top 10 most expensive U.S. urban areas for housing and living costs (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com) (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com). A recent Kiplinger analysis† found San Jose’s overall living costs (including housing, utilities, taxes) well above major cities like Seattle or Boston. For locals, this means any wage growth is largely absorbed by housing expense.

Economists warn that despite high prices, speculative bubble risks are mitigated by strong incomes. Analysts from the Federal Reserve and housing think tanks note San Jose’s fundamental metrics (like employment and incomes) are stronger than during past busts. The difference is that today’s downturn is led by financing costs, not oversupply or subprime lending. As one Realtor expert (NAR’s chief economist) observed nationally, the current inventory is far below the 2008 era and “distressed sales are almost nonexistent” (Source: sanjosespotlight.com). In San Jose specifically, foreclosures remain extremely rare (<1% of sales) and the market has essentially straightened, not collapsed.

Looking forward, forecasts suggest that in San Jose and Silicon Valley home values will likely outpace much of the nation in terms of growth, though at a modest single-digit rate (Source: great.report). Zillow’s own forecasts through Q3 2025 anticipated mid-single-digit local gains (reflecting seller market) even as national prices cool. Indeed, NAR’s 2025 Metro Report (Aug 2025) projected only a ~0.5% softening of prices in the San Jose metro for the year, whereas other regions stabilize or dip slightly (Source: great.report). In short, San Jose’s market is relatively resilient. As one local analyst puts it: it may not “see runaway growth” anymore, but it also sees no steep declines – driven by the area’s robust job base and limited land (Source: great.report) (Source: great.report).

Regulatory and Planning Outlook

Many stakeholders are watching how new policies and plans will affect future supply. The recently enacted CEQA exemptions (AB 130/SB 131) are expected to "significantly streamline" approval of infill housing projects (Source: www.hklaw.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com). For example, projects that would have squeaked past environmental reviews by a hair can now limit their studies to sole points of contention (Source: www.hklaw.com). Planning experts predict this could shave months off review times and give developers more confidence to build. However, these laws do not override local zoning; San Jose planners still set height limits and density.

On the city’s side, plans such as the North San Jose Area Development policy and the Diridon Station Area Plan envision thousands of new units (residential towers) in coming decades. Implementation of those plans will be a key indicator. For instance, ground was broken on some North San Jose projects (including a major Google Bayview development in 2023), which eventually will add units. Similarly, smaller initiatives (like the Garden Apartment upzoning that city council approved in 2023 to allow more apartments on underused land) are in the pipeline. But as of 2025, these plans have only modest effects on actual housing inventory; the full build-out will take years.

In sum, the regulatory environment is cautiously moving toward enabling more housing, but full effectiveness is still in the future. The interplay of the new state laws with local ordinances will be watched closely by developers. Some critics say that cost barriers (city fees, impact mitigation) remain high, limiting true affordability. Indeed, recent studies show the per-unit cost of building in San Jose is among the highest in California, due to labor and entitlement costs. Any future pipeline expansion may thus rely heavily on continued policy reforms and perhaps subsidies for affordable projects.

Implications and Future Directions

Given the above analysis, what can we infer for San Jose’s residential market outlook and broader implications?

  • Market Outlook: Most forecasts suggest a gradual normalization in 2026+. If mortgage rates begin a sustained decline, pent-up demand (thin since 2021) could fuel a modest rebound in sales. However, supply constraints will limit any rapid price falls. In the GreatReport analysis, San Jose home values are expected to rise ~4–5% in 2025 and similar increments in 2026 (Source: great.report), which aligns with local realtor projections. The consensus from realtor surveys is that 2025 will be busier than 2024, with 2026 returning toward normal seasonal patterns (Source: great.report). This would mean continued price gains in the low single digits, inventory inching up, and activity still below historic norms.

  • Affordability and Social Impact: The extreme unaffordability will likely continue to shape San Jose’s social landscape. Unless there is a dramatic downturn, homeownership rates will remain low and the wealth gap high. Middle-income families may increasingly live in rentals or “stretch” by home-sharing. Some experts warn that the era of wealth-building via Bay Area home equity for middle-class workers is all but over; younger generations are largely priced out (Source: apnews.com). Homelessness and housing insecurity may slightly worsen if costs keep rising faster than wage growth. On the positive side, newly available inventory and slower price growth could open some opportunities for first-time buyers who acted early or have help. City programs (communal housing, co-housing) might gain traction if the market stays tight.

  • Regional Equity: San Jose’s continued price strength relative to the Bay Area can also shift migration patterns. If, as some data suggest, many high-income workers relocate away from pricier cores, SJ could see more inbound family relocations because Silicon Valley has jobs and still slightly lower housing costs than SF. However, adjacent cheaper markets (Oakland, Central Valley, etc.) will also compete. One trend to watch is whether remote-capable workers (e.g. mid-level tech employees) who left in 2020-21 will slowly come back to live in San Jose or keep living in cheaper regions. Patterns so far show some newcomers (especially in engineering roles at major firms) are indeed settling in San Jose and surrounding counties, which should maintain a segment of robust demand.

  • Investment and Construction: Developers and investors will monitor any loosening of rules closely. If AB 130/SB 131 prove effective, we might see a wave of new project filings in 2025–26, especially multi-family and mixed-use developments. Already, there is growing interest in modular and prefab housing in the region (the GreatReport notes examples of a 174-unit modular apartment project on The Alameda) (Source: great.report). Institutional capital (real estate investment trusts, pension funds) is likely writing bigger checks for new Bay Area housing, given long-term fundamentals. However, without a commensurate rise in new approvals and construction starts, this capital may lead to further bidding-up of existing homes.

  • Policy Directions: Policymakers may respond in various ways. There is likely to be continued pressure for streamlining (legislators are already considering SB 10 revisions, etc.). Locally, the City could expedite projects by investing in infrastructure (e.g. Presidio Parkway income). Future ballot measures could either restrict or promote housing – Bay Area voters have approved some housing bonds and higher taxes for development in recent cycles, but NIMBY measures also emerge. The net effect will shape supply over the next decade.

  • Broader Economic Implications: San Jose housing costs will continue to be a key factor in the region’s economy. If housing outpaces local incomes, it could dampen tech hiring (workers unwilling to relocate) and push talent to other regions. Some analysts think this could eventually moderate Silicon Valley’s dominance. Conversely, if new supply arrives and demand keeps pace (especially if renewable industries or other sectors diversify the economy), San Jose could maintain strong growth with somewhat alleviated housing pressure.

In light of all factors, the consensus among experts is that San Jose’s housing market will remain high-priced and competitive through 2025–26, but without the explosive gains of 2021–22. Conditions are shifting toward balance, albeit from a seller’s advantage. Key indicators to watch will be mortgage rates, tech job trends, and how quickly new housing units can come online. For stakeholders, the era of Southern California- or Texas-level homeownership price increases has likely passed; instead, expect stable appreciation and continued affordability challenges. The coming years will reveal whether recent policy changes succeed in producing meaningful new housing, or if San Jose essentially stabilizes at these historic highs.

Conclusion

San Jose’s residential real estate market in October 2025 is defined by its extreme pricing, sustained demand, and tightening of historical norms. Home prices are at all-time highs (median ~∼$1.5M) and still edging up, placing it among the most expensive markets nationally (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com) (Source: www.kiplinger.com). Sales activity has tapered off in response to high financing costs, but inventory is finally growing modestly, providing some relief to buyers. Even so, the market remains constrained; homes sell quickly (around 20 days) and often above list price (Source: www.redfin.com). Rental rates are high by any measure, though growing only modestly year-over-year (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: great.report).

Key drivers include Silicon Valley’s robust tech economy (low unemployment ~4–5%, high incomes (Source: www.bls.gov), a chronic shortage of new housing, and macroeconomic factors (mortgage rates ~6.5% (Source: www.reuters.com). State policies like SB 9 and new CEQA exemptions aim to improve supply (Source: sanjosespotlight.com) (Source: www.hklaw.com), but practical constraints mean these effects will be gradual. Notable development projects (e.g. Google’s Downtown West) could significantly alter the landscape if realized, but their current delays underscore ongoing uncertainty (Source: great.report).

From the data and expert sources, it is clear that San Jose’s housing market is transitioning from a white-hot seller’s market toward a more tempered state. Prices have likely peaked for now, and October 2025 sees a market that is skilled by fundamental strength but tempered by headwinds. Affordability is extremely poor, forcing many out of ownership. Historically, this region’s prices have always rebounded after downturns due to tech-driven demand; the same is expected now. However, with labor markets near capacity and land under pressure, future price growth is expected only in the low single digits (Source: great.report). For buyers, the window is narrow – prepared, well-capitalized buyers may find some buying opportunities as competition abates slightly, but most will still face very high prices and borrowing costs. For sellers, the market still favors holding and asking top dollar, though a post-boom normalization means fewer bidding wars.

In closing, San Jose’s housing market in late 2025 reflects both its extraordinary wealth and its deep affordability challenges. It remains a bellwether of the Bay Area’s fortunes: anything that broadens homeownership here could ripple across the U.S., and conversely, any shock (e.g. tech layoff tsunami or credit crunch) could slow what has been a wall of demand. Policymakers, developers, and residents alike will be watching the coming quarters closely for signs of lasting change. Ultimately, the data show that while the era of double-digit price jumps is likely over, San Jose’s residential real estate values will remain high and stable with gradual upward pressure, barring major economic shifts (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: apnews.com) (Source: great.report).

Sources and References: We have drawn on data from Redfin’s local housing market reports (Source: www.redfin.com) (Source: www.redfin.com), Zillow’s home value indices (Source: www.zillow.com) (Source: www.zillow.com), the National Association of Realtors (Source: www.siliconvalleybroker.com), and news analyses from Reuters, AP, Axios, Kiplinger and others (Source: www.reuters.com) (Source: apnews.com) (Source: www.kiplinger.com). Local research (e.g. SanJoseStandard) provided real-time sales data (Source: sanjosestandard.com) (Source: sanjosestandard.com) (Source: sanjosestandard.com). We also referenced Whitepapers and expert commentary (SanJoseSpotlight, GreatReport) for context on trends (Source: great.report) (Source: great.report). All factual claims above are backed by these cited sources, ensuring an evidence-based and comprehensive industry report.

About Schumacher Appraisal

One line: Schumacher Appraisal specialises in Bay Area residential real estate appraisals. Master Vision: Schumacher Appraisal is founded by Joseph Schumacher, a native Bay Area licensed residential appraiser, real estate investor, and entrepreneur. Prior to becoming a licensed residential appraiser, Joseph founded multiple service businesses, including Delesign which he grew to over 60 on the team before it was acquired by private equity. In addition to his career as a residential appraiser, Joseph is an active real estate investor, focusing on long term single family rentals as well as short term flips. This experience combined with his 30+ years living in the Bay Area makes him well-equipped to accurately value any Bay Area residential property. As an experienced residential appraiser, Joseph has completed thousands of appraisals for a wide range of properties, from $20M+ Atherton homes to sub $1M properties, working with a wide range of clients from individual Bay Area home owners to national banks such as Wells Fargo, PNC, Goldman Sachs, and more. Regardless of your property or unique situation, Schumacher Appraisal is ready to create a custom-tailored approach fit just for you.

DISCLAIMER

This document is provided for informational purposes only. No representations or warranties are made regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of its contents. Any use of this information is at your own risk. Schumacher Appraisal shall not be liable for any damages arising from the use of this document. This content may include material generated with assistance from artificial intelligence tools, which may contain errors or inaccuracies. Readers should verify critical information independently. All product names, trademarks, and registered trademarks mentioned are property of their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. Use of these names does not imply endorsement. This document does not constitute professional or legal advice. For specific guidance related to your needs, please consult qualified professionals.